This paper bases upon the text just to explain the pragmatism in the learning criticism of <Zongmu>.
本文从学术批评角度出发，立足于文本自身系统地阐释了致用思想指导下《总目》的学术批评。
Results showed that the compilation and printing of indexes were rather confusing and only three of them were actually used: general contents, subject index and author index.
结果是:编印的索引混乱,而且只用了3种索引,即总目次、主题索引和著者索引。
The author has learned standards about compiling the general contents and indices of journals of China, read and checked fifty journals and made statistics and analysis of the general contents and indices.
鉴于部分学报编辑对“总目次”和“索引”编排规范执行得不够严格 ,作者查阅了全国 5 0种学报 ,并对照有关标准和规范 ,就各项内容做了量化统计分析 ,发现这方面存在不少问题。
A Query about Catalogue The Yan Family Instructions in Ru of Summary of the Catalogue of Sikuquanshu;
《颜氏家训》在《总目提要》中归于子部杂家质疑
Achievements and Influences of Chong Wen Zong Mu s Classification in History of Bibliography;
《崇文总目》的分类在目录学史上的成就和影响