inequality

As informatization progresses in society, the cause and structural nature of social inequality changes as well.

However, they generally agree with the idea that inequality in the information society is fundamentally different from that of an industrial society.

Scholars of the information society are divided over whether social inequality decreases or increases in an information-based society.

The increasing differences in child rearing between rich and poor families reflect growing social inequality.

The class differences in child rearing are growing—a symptom of widening inequality with far-reaching consequences.

Meanwhile, growing income inequality has coincided with the increasing importance of a college degree for earning a middle-class wage.

In the past decade, even as income inequality has grown, some of the socioeconomic differences in parenting, like reading to children and going to libraries, have narrowed.

Early childhood experiences can be very consequential for children's long-term social, emotional and cognitive development, said Sean Reardon, professor of poverty and inequality in education at Stanford University.

Addressing differences in the earliest years, it seems, could reduce inequality in the next generation.

It contributes little to the elimination of inequality.

America's education system has become less a ladder of opportunity than a structure to transmit inequality from one generation to the next.

Obama is only the most prominent public figure to declare inequality Public Enemy No.

It is most imperative to focus our efforts on the elimination of income inequality.

Inequality itself is not a particularly strong predictor of economic mobility, as sociologist Scott Winship noted in a recent article based on his analysis of this data.

Inequality is dangerous, he argued, not merely because it doesn't look good to have a large gap between the rich and the poor, but because inequality itself destroys upward mobility, making it harder for the poor to escape from poverty.

Increased inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American Dream, he said.

Economic inequality is the defining challenge of our time.

Just one week after Obama was elected president, participants were less ready to support policies designed to address racial inequality than they had been two weeks before the election.

Those trying to address issues of racial inequality need to constantly remind people of the inequalities that still exist to counteract the Obama's effect, she says

A negative side of the Obama effect is that people are now less ready to support policies addressing racial inequality

people are now less ready to support policies addressing racial inequality

Cheryl Kaiser holds that people should be constantly reminded that racial inequality still persists in American society.

racial inequality still persists in American society

Those trying to address issues of racial inequality need to constantly remind people of the inequalities that still exist to counteract the Obama's effect, she says.

Though Plant's findings were more positive, she too warns against thinking that racism and racial inequalities are no longer a problem

"Increased inequality and decreasing mobility pose a fundamental threat to the American Dream," he said.

Data reveals that economic inequality rather than family income might affect people's well-being.

Economic inequality is the "defining challenge of our time".

However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality.

Inequality itself is not a particularly strong predictor of economic mobility, as sociologist Scott winship noted in a recent article based on his analysis of this data.

They found some evidence that some crude measures, like income inequality, correlated with changes in well-being, but economic measures with a more direct impact, like family income and unemployment rates which put families into difficulties, had no relat

While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality.

Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today – embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities.

At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.

Taxes on low-wage labor need to be cut, and wage subsidies such as the earned income tax credit should be expanded: This would boost incomes, encourage work, reward companies for job creation, and reduce inequality.

At a time when Thomas piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.

firms seem to invest more in places where most people are relatively happy, rather than in places with happiness inequality.

Income inequality usually falls during a recession, but it has not shrunk in this one.

Some imagine that the coming work-free world will be defined by inequality.